DNB Bank ASA v Gulf Eyadah - DIFC Courts: A conduit Jurisdiction?

Analysis

Sarah Malik and IIham Kabbouri examine the impact of the Dubai International Financial Centre Courts judgment in DNB Bank ASA v Gulf Eyadah.

The Dubai International Financial Centre Court of Appeal recently held, in the case of DNB Bank ASA v Gulf Eyadah [CA-007-2015] (25 February 2016), that

a foreign judgment, when granted recognition in the DIFC Courts becomes a local judgment of the DIFC Courts and should therefore be treated as such by the Dubai Courts

This represents an important and landmark decision in relation to the jurisdiction of the DIFC Courts and is a positive step in recognising the international nature of the DIFC Courts.

      I.          Background

After obtaining judgment by the English Commercial Court requiring Gulf Eyadah Corporation & Gulf Navigation Holding PJSC (Defendants/Respondents) to pay US$8.7 million plus costs under various contracts, the Claimant/Appellant (DNB Bank ASA) sought the enforcement of the said judgment in the DIFC Courts.

The Defendants contested the jurisdiction of the DIFC Courts, inter alia , on the grounds that:

· there was no immediate nexus with the DIFC- the Defendants' assets were located onshore; and