Using Mediation to Resolve Sports Related Disputes

Analysis

Businesses, officials, coaches and athletes have traditionally turned to litigation and arbitration as the first resort when negotiations become deadlocked.

However, the adversarial nature of litigation and arbitration frequently drives these protagonists (i.e. parties) further apart as they compete to win the case. A case won or lost often does not change the mindset of parties who continue to be adversaries and go on fighting in appeal after appeal. Motivated by the high costs, delays, stresses and uncertainties associated with litigation and arbitration, business is increasingly turning to mediation as the first resort.

In sports-related disputes, national and international sporting institutions, such as the Court of Arbitration for Sport, are now actively encouraging parties to attempt mediation at the first opportunity.  The World Intellectual Property Organisation, which offers sports-related intellectual property dispute  resolution services (sponsorship, merchandising, broadcasting etc.), also promotes mediation.

Nonetheless common misperceptions about mediation persist e.g. that it is a soft option or that it gives the impression that an athlete, coach or business is weak or exposed.  As a result, opportunities to find the most satisfactory deal, while maintaining valuable business relationships, may be missed.