UAE 1/2013/1

The original dispute involved whether a contract to purchase property should be rescinded because the title had not been registered with the new owner and they had bought another property instead. A key issue was whether it was possible to reopen the issue as there had been a previous judgment on it even if there was different evidence. The case also looked at whether the judge was able to consider the case because of previously involvement.

Background

A Plaintiff filed action No 967/2010 Al Sharjah against the Respondent demanding a provisional seizure on a property in Sharjah and to allow the chamber complete the seizure procedure and rescind an agreement signed between the parties on 15/10/2008 and reinstate them to their former position and to order the First Respondent to pay him 3,00,000 AED with interest.