SCA 5670/2016
This case involved unpaid goods. A key issue was the impact of a worker signing the bill who it was said lacked authorisation.
Background
A company filed a case against a company before the court. They requested the court to order the other company to pay 92644 Riyals. They said they supplied the company with raw materials but the latter failed to pay . The company provided the court with document that proved their claim.
The other company said that the worker who signed the bill did not have the authorization to do so. It said that they had filed a case against the worker.
Decision
The court ruled that the other company should pay the mentioned amount.
The other company appealed the ruling before the court of appeal.
The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the appealed ruling.