SCA 888/2015

This case involved a contract to rent vehicles. Non-payment was claimed along with failure to meet a contract obligation to fix the cars. Evidence was not provided on this point.

Background

A company filed a case against another company before the court. They requested the court to order the company to pay an amount of money. She said that the company had rented cars from them but had failed to commit to their obligations.

The two parties requested the court to settle the dispute amicably. The company then requested the court to issue its ruling.

Decision

The court ruled that the company should pay the mentioned amount.

The second company objected to the ruling. They said that the first company had failed to commit to their obligations because Article 10 of the agreed contract stipulated that the company should fix the cars in their workshop but she failed to do so.

The court said that the case documents revealed that the second company had failed to prove their claims.

The court approved the elementary ruling.