The Public Prosecution filed its lawsuit against a defendant on charges of possessing a can containing intoxicating alcohol for personal use.

The Public Prosecutor demanded that he be charged and sentenced to a discretionary penalty.

The defendant admitted the validity of what was stated in the lawsuit but argued that he did not know what was seized, but the car was under his control.

The General Court said, based on the case and answers, and the defendant’s admission of the Public Prosecutor’s claim. The admission was evidence that must be acted upon, and since the defendant had admitted that the car was under his control and he was the person was being held accountable for that, the defendant’s conviction for what was attributed to him was confirmed. The court sentenced him to be given 70 lashes at once, and order to made a a strong pledge not to do so again.