SBG 2117/2016

This case involved the remedies available after the dismissal of a contract to rent equipment.

Background

A company filed a case against a company before the court. They requested the court to dismiss a contract signed with the other company. They also requested the court to order the other company to return the equipment that it had rented. The company said that the other company had failed to pay the value of the contract.

Decision

The court ruled that the contract should be dismissed and that the other company should return the mentioned equipment.

The other company appealed the ruling before the court of appeal.

The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the appealed ruling.