SBG 996/2015
This case involved whether a dispute involving the reservation of the department of traffic of a car should be heard by this court.
Background
A claimant filed a case against the department of traffic before the court. He said that the department reserved his car. He requested the court to order the department to pay him a compensation.
The court ruled that the consideration of the case did not fall under its jurisdiction.
The claimant appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court repealed the ruling and referred the case to the elementary court.
Decision
The court said that the claimant had committed a traffic violation according to Article 69 of the Law of Traffic. The court said that Article 67 of the Law of Traffic stipulated that the case related to traffic violations should be considered by the relevant courts.
The court ruled that the consideration of the case did not fall under its jurisdiction.
The claimant appealed the ruling before the court of appeal.
The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the appealed ruling.