A claimant filed a case against a governmental institution before the court. He requested the court dismiss a decision by which the institution refused to appoint him to his position.

The court ruled that the mentioned decision should be dismissed.

The institution appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court repealed the ruling and referred the case to the elementary court.

The court considered the documents of the case. The court said that Article 6A of the Law of the End of Service stipulated that the employee should be referred to the retirement scheme when they reached 60. The court said that the documents of the case revealed that the claimant was 76 years old.

The court dismissed the case.

The court of appeal upheld the ruling.