The council of supervision and investigation filed a case against a defendant before the court. They said that the defendant had violated the obligations of his job. They requested the court to charge him and penalize him accordingly.

The court said that the documents of the case revealed that the defendant had not violated his job obligations.

The council objected to the ruling and the court of appeal repealed the ruling.

The court considered the documents of the case. The court said that Article 7 of the Law of Advocacy stipulated that a punitive case should include all the defendant's details including the violation he had commits. The court said that the documents revealed that the documents missed out the ruling on the grounds of which the council made its request.

The court dismissed the case.

The court of appeal upheld the ruling.