SBG 3015/2015

This case involve a partnership dispute where there was a request to change the capital shares of each partner. As the partners were relatives the judges should have tried to arrange a reconciliation.

Background

A claimant filed a case against a defendant before the court. He requested the court to prevent the defendant from taking any action regarding the company they owned together. He also requested the court to change the shares of the capital of each partner.

Decision

The court considered the documents of the case. The court said that the documents revealed that the claimant had failed to edit his case. The court also said that the claimant and the defendant were relatives and therefore the judges should try to reconcile the dispute between the two parties.

The court dismissed the case.

The court of appeal upheld the ruling