A claimant filed a case against the department of traffic before the court. He said that he had a car accident due to sliding on the road. He said that the department should be responsible for the safety of the roads. The claimant requested the court to order the department to pay him compensation.

The court considered the documents of the case. The court said that the documents of the case revealed that the department of the roads was responsible for pouring the diesel on the road. The court said that the department of the traffic was therefore an irrelevant party in the case.

The court dismissed the case.

The claimant appealed the ruling before the court of appeal.

The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the appealed ruling.