KCC 1/2021
This case involved an individual who had stolen materials from a company and a claim for compensation. On appeal it was decided to present the case to the eneral authority of civil and commercial provisions who decided the court had issued contradictory decisions on the case so it was referred to the commercial department in the court for consideration.
Background
A company filed a case against a defendant before the court. The company requested the court to order the defendant to pay compensation of 95000 Dinars. The company said that the defendant had stolen raw materials from the company.
The court dismissed the case.
The company appealed the ruling before the court of appeal.
The company appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court upheld the appealed ruling.
The company appealed the ruling before the court of cassation.
Decision
The court of cassation presented the appeal to the general authority of civil and commercial provisions. The authority found that the court had issued contradictory decisions on the case.
The authority decided to refer the appeal to the commercial department in the court for consideration.