The office of public prosecution accused a defendant of robbery. The office requested the court to penalize the defendant according to the relevant laws.

The court ruled that the defendant should be imprisoned for one year and eight months.

The defendant appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court upheld the appealed ruling.

The defendant appealed the ruling before the court of cassation. He said in his grounds of appeal that the ruling had erred in the application of law and had insufficient evidence of causation. He said that he had maintained before the court that his arrest was invalid. He said that the court had established the ruling on the grounds of the police officer’s testimony though it was inaccurate.