Two claimants filed a case against a defendant before the court. They requested the court to order the defendant to dismiss a decision by which he had refused to cancel security restrictions imposed on their citizenship file.

The court ruled that the restrictions should be cancelled.

The defendant appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court upheld the appealed ruling.

The defendant appealed the ruling before the court of cassation. He said in his grounds of appeal that the ruling had erred in the application of law. He said that the consideration of the case did not fall under the jurisdiction of the court.

The court said that this argument was invalid. The court said that the consideration of the case fell under the jurisdiction of the court.

The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the appealed ruling.