The claimants filed a case against the defendants before the court. They requested the court to order the defendants to order the defendants to sell their father's share in the properties he had inherited according to the value estimated by the expert.

The court dismissed the case.

The claimants appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court upheld the appealed ruling.

The claimants appealed the ruling before the court of cassation. They said in their grounds of appeal that the ruling haderred in the application of law. They said that they owned the majority of the inheritance and had the right to order the defendant to sell the share.

The court said that this argument was invalid. The court said that the request made by the claimants was illegal because they wanted to force the defendants to sell part of their shares in the property against their will.

The court upheld the appealed ruling.