The claimants filed a case against the defendants before the court. They requested the court to dismiss the document No. 6353/2004 and dismissed the registration of a disputed property. They said that the first claimant had bought a property from the defendant and that the area of the property was less than the two parties agreed on.

The court dismissed the case.

The claimants appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the appealed ruling.

The claimants appealed the ruling before the court of cassation. They said in their grounds of appeal that the ruling had been invalid. They said that the ruling included a mistake in the names of the disputed parties.

The court said that this argument was invalid. The court said that the mistake in the names of the disputed parties was not a serious one and it should not result in the dismissal of the ruling.