The office of public prosecution accused a defendant of robbery and driving the car without licence. The office requested the court to penalize the defendant according to the relevant law.

The court ruled that the defendant should be imprisoned for three years. The court ruled that the defendant should be deported from the country after the execution of the ruling.

The defendant appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the appealed ruling.

The defendant appealed the ruling before the court of cassation. He said in his grounds of appeal that the ruling had erred in the application of law. He said that the elements of crime of robbery crime had not existed in his case.

The court said that this argument was invalid. The court considered all aspects of the case properly and established the ruling on the grounds of solid evidence. The court said that the elements of the crime had existed in the case.