Background

A bank filed a case against a defendant and requested the court to order the defendant to pay the remaining value of a loan he had previously received.

The court ruled the defendant should pay the bank 36256.027 Dinars pls 331.403 Dinars.

The bank and the defendant appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court upheld the appealed ruling.

Decision

The bank and the defendant appealed the ruling before the court of cassation.

In Appeal No. 1547/2013: The defendant stated the ruling had contradictions of material documentary evidence and a previous ruling had ruled that he no longer owed the amount to the bank.

The court stated this argument was invalid because the previous ruling had ruled that the defendant no longer owed the amount he had already paid. The court stated the defendant still owed the amount stated on the loan.

The court dismissed the appeal.