KCC 893/2013

This case involved whether there was suitable evidence of money owed as a result of a breach of a contract.

Background

The documents of the case revealed that the court had ruled that the company (appellant) should pay an amount of money to a company.

Decision

The court said that the court had established its ruling on the grounds of the expert report confirmed that the company owed this amount as a result of a contracting contract which had been signed between the two parties. The court said that the court established its ruling on the grounds of solid evidence and that the company's defence was irrelevant in this regard.

The court dismissed the appeal.