The documents of the case revealed that the court had dismissed the case made by the appellant.

The court said that the court had established its ruling on the grounds that the budgets provided by the appellant lacked details about the value of the net profits of the disputed commercial activity. The court said that the court could not therefore check the appellant's claims in this regard. The court said that the appellant had also failed to prove that he had supplied the litigant with the claimed goods. The court said that the court established its ruling on the grounds of solid evidences

The court dismissed the appeal.