The court of cassation said that the court upheld the appealed ruling that dismissed the appellant's request for changing the judge who considered the case due to enmity which existed between the two parties.

The court said that the appellant had failed prove the existence of such enmity between himself and the judge existed. The court said that the evaluation of the existence of the enmity fell under the authority of the court. The court said that the court also dismissed the appellant's request for delaying the consideration of the case. The court said that the court was not obliged to respond so such a request and that the delay of the consideration of the case fell under the authority of the court.

The court dismissed the appeal.