KCC 309, 322/2013
This case involved whether there was solid evidence the appellant should pay money to a company, when he had promised to pay in weekly instalments.
Background
The documents of the case revealed that the court concluded that the appellant should pay the company an amount of money.
Decision
The court said that the court had established its ruling on the grounds that the appellant had formerly admitted that he owed an amount of money to the company as a result of a commercial transaction and that he had promised to pay the debt through weekly instalments. The court said that the report of expert concluded that the appellant had paid 541 Dinars and that he still owed 500 Dinars. The court said that the court established its ruling on the grounds of solid evidence and that the appellant's defence was irrelevant in this regard.
The court dismissed the appeal.