The court of cassation said that the court had dismissed a case on the grounds that the appellant still owed an amount of money to a company. The court said that the appellant and the company had reached a reconciliation agreement which stipulated that the former should pay the latter the amount. The court said that the documents of the case, however, revealed that the appellant had failed to provide an evidence that the mentioned amount had already paid. The court said that the evaluation of the contracts signed between the disputed parties fell under the authority of the court. The court said that the court established its ruling on solid evidence.

The court dismissed the appeal.