The documents of the case revealed that the court had ruled that the appellant should pay an amount of money to the litigant.

The court said that the court established its ruling on the grounds of the report of expert which concluded that the litigant had completed all the work that he was assigned to do by the appellant. The court said that the court concluded that the appellant's defence that he lost delay fines was irrelevant because the contract signed between the two parties did not stipulate a certain period for the completion of the works. The court said that the court established its ruling on the grounds of solid evidence.

The court dismissed the appeal.