The documents of the case revealed that the court had ruled that the appellant should pay amount of money to a company.

The court said that the court had established its ruling on the grounds that the appellant bought two horses from the company and bills and shipping documents. The court said that the court concluded that the two horses were shipped along with other horses in the same shipment and that the appellant had received them. The court said that the court established its ruling on the grounds of solid evidence including the testimonies of the witnesses. The court said that the appellant's defence that he did not receive the horses was irrelevant in this regard.

The court dismissed the appeal.