The documents of the case revealed that the court had dismissed the appealed ruling by which the appellant would be compensated for an injury.

The court said that the court had dismissed the case as well on the grounds that the appellant had failed to provide tangible evidence of the injuries that she claimed compensation for. The court said that the court dismissed the tenancy agreement signed between the appellant and the litigant on the grounds that the litigant had failed to deliver the rented property on time. The court said that the court established its ruling on the grounds of solid evidence and that the appellant's defence was irrelevant in this regard.

The court dismissed the appeals.