The documents of the case revealed that the court had dismissed the appellant's defence that the case document made by the litigant should be considered to be invalid.

The court said that the appellants had maintained that the litigant had failed to mention the exact names of the companies that they represented in the case document. The court said that the court dismissed this defence on the grounds that the material mistake in the names or details of the disputed parties should not result in the invalidity of the case. The court said that the court had established its ruling on the grounds of the report of the expert which concluded that the appellants owed amount of money to the litigant as a result of a contract signed between the two parties. The court said that the court established its ruling on the grounds of solid evidence.

The court dismissed the appeal