KCC 1296/2012
This case involved whether compensation should be paid by a litigant who had failed to give the correct description for a property being registered as part of a sale. Key aspects included the loss of commission to the agent because of the mistake. The lack of notification to the appellant was not relevant.
Background
The documents of the case revealed that the court ruled that the appellant should pay an amount of money on the grounds that they had failed to provide an accurate description of the disputed property to the department of the property registration.
Decision
The court said that the court had concluded that the appellant had violated the signed contract with the litigants and they should therefore pay the mentioned amount. The court said that the court also concluded that the appellant had caused damage to the first litigant which lost the brokerage fees as a result of the appellant's violation. The court said that the the appellant's defence that they were not informed with the appeal document was irrelevant because the delay was not made by the litigant. The court said that the court established its ruling on the grounds of solid evidence.