The documents of the case revealed that the court had concluded that the appellant was properly informed about the disputed payment order.

The court said that the court had established its ruling on the grounds that the notice was sent to the appellant's address which was registered in his civil card. The court said that the appellant had failed to prove that the mentioned address was not his address. The court said that the court concluded that the appellant did not have the right to appeal the ruling because he had failed to introduce his appeal within the legal deadline. The court said that the appellant's defence that the notice was invalid because it did not include his basic personal details was irrelevant. The court said that the court established its ruling on the grounds of solid evidence.

The court dismissed the appeal.