The documents of the case revealed that the court had ruled that the appellants should pay an amount of money to the litigant.

The court said that the court had established its ruling on the grounds that the appellants had authorized the litigant to determine the administrative and maintenance fees of two chalets that the appellant had rented. The court said that the expert made a mistake in calculating the amounts of the money the appellants had to pay and that this mistake should not affect the validity of the case and the report of the expert. The court said that the appellants' defence was irrelevant and that the court had established its ruling on the grounds of solid evidence.

The court dismissed the appeal.