KCC 232/2009
Background
A claimant filed a case against the defendants and requested the court to validate his previous career period and to add it to his service period and to order the defendants to pay him a nature of work allowance.
The court ruled that the decision made by the defendants should be dismissed and that the defendants should pay the claimant the allowance.
The defendants appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court abandoned the appealed ruling and rejected the case.
Decision
The claimant appealed the ruling before the court of cassation.
The court of cassation repealed the ruling and decided to carry out an investigation with the disputed parties.
The court then changed the appealed ruling and ruled the claimant should be received the same salary that he used to receive in his previous position.