KCC 66/2010
Background
An employee filed a case against a company requesting that the court order the company to pay his salaries.
The court rejected the case.
The employee appealed and the appeal court upheld the ruling.
The employee appealed by cassation.
Decision
Before the cassation court the employee argued that the ruling had erred in the application of law as the court had established its ruling on the employee having reached final settlement with the company for the payment of all his salaries, however, the court had ignored documents he provided stating otherwise.
The court held that this argument was valid as the court had ignored the employee's defence despite it being a substantial one that may have altered the ruling outcome.
The court therefore repealed the ruling.