KCC 360/2009
This case involved an individual convicted of robbery. Key points included whether the appeal was outside the deadline and the validity of the ruling as it had not confirmed the law under which they were convicted.
Background
First Appeal:
An appellant said in his grounds of appeal that the appealed ruling by which his appeal was rejected in form had been invalid. He said that the ruling was issued in his absence and he was not informed of the hearings in the elementary court and therefore he had failed to make his appeal within the legal deadline.
Second Appeal:
An appellant said in his grounds of appeal that the appealed ruling by which he was convicted of robbery had been invalid. He said that the court had failed to indicate the text of the law by which the appellant was convicted.
Decision
First Appeal: