An appellant said in his grounds of appeal that the appealed ruling by which he was convicted of beating someone had erred in the application of law and had insufficient evidence of causation. He said that he was not legally informed of the hearing in which the case was considered. He also said that the documents of the case lacked the evidence that he had committed this crime.

The court of cassation said that this argument was invalid. The court said that the court had considered all aspects of the incident properly and concluded that the elements of the crime existed in the case. The court said that the court established its ruling on the grounds of solid evidence including the testimony of the victim. The court said that the documents of the case revealed that the appellant had failed to explain the invalidity of the proceedings by which he was informed with the hearing.

The court dismissed the appeal.