KCC 1151/2008

This case involved a claim for an unpaid company debt against its manager. The key issue was whether there was sufficient proof of the company's status to require the manager to pay the amount.

Background

A claimant filed a case against a defendant and a company and asked the court to order them to pay an amount of money.

The court rejected the case.

The claimant appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court upheld the appealed ruling.

Decision

The claimant appealed the ruling before the court of cassation and stated in his grounds of appeal that the ruling had insufficient evidence of causation and that the company documents included no proof that it was a limited company and a determination of its capital which meant he had the right to claim the value of debt from the defendant (who was the company manager).

The court stated this argument was invalid because the claimant had failed to prove his claims by providing the company documents.

The court dismissed the appeal.