Background

A company filed a case against a defendant and requested the court to order the defendant to vacate a rented property.

The court ruled that the defendant should vacate the rented property.

The defendant appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court upheld the appealed ruling.

Decision

The defendant appealed the ruling before the court of cassation and stated in its grounds of appeal that the ruling had insufficient evidence of causation and that the interest gained by the company due to the ruling was comparable to the damage the defendant had received.

The court stated this argument was invalid and that the company had used its legal right to terminate the tenancy agreement and given the relevant notice.

The court dismissed the appeal.