KCC 626/2003
Background
A company filed a case against defendants and requested the court to order the first three defendants to provide all the assets which were related to the first defendant (which was a company) and validate legal reservations on these assets.
The court rejected the case.
Decision
The company appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court upheld the appealed ruling.
The company appealed the ruling before the court of cassation and stated in its grounds of appeal that the ruling had erred in the application of law and that the court had ruled that the establishment contract of the company (which was the fourth defendant) was illegal which meant that the court should apply this ruling over the case.
The court stated this argument was invalid.
The court dismissed the appeal.