Background

A claimant filed a case against defendants requesting that the court order them to pay an amount of money determined by an expert.

The court rejected the case.

The claimant appealed and the appeal court upheld the ruling.

The claimant appealed by cassation.

Decision

Before the cassation court the claimant argued that the ruling had erred in the application of law as the court had ignored the documents issued by the company which proved she had an account in the company and the company had not denied this fact.

The court held that this argument was valid and repealed the ruling.