KCC 730/2000

This case involved a request for temporary compensation from a bank, and profits from shares and interest. It was wrongly argued the bank had no right to claim the value of the remaining shares as five years had passed. However, the period in Article 102 of the company law was not a deadline or limitation period.

Background

A claimant filed a case against two defendants and requested the court to order the first defendant (a bank) to pay her temporary compensation of 5001 Dinars and the value of profits on shares and interest.

The court rejected the case.

The claimant appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court upheld the appealed ruling.

Decision

The claimant appealed the ruling before the court of cassation and stated in her grounds of appeal that the ruling had erred in the application of law because she had maintained before the court that the bank had no right to claim the value of the remaining shares and the decision of the bank's general assembly should be dismissed because it was five years since the IPO.