The documents of the case revealed that the court had concluded that the appellant still owed an amount of money to to the debtor as a result of loan contract.

The court said that the court concluded that the interests on the loan complied with the decisions of the Central Bank. The court said that the appellant's defence that he was not informed with the report of expert was invalid. The court said that the documents of the case revealed that the legal representative of the appellant were informed that the expert submitted his report. The court said that the court was not obliged to respond to the appellant's request for returning the case for the consideration again. The court said that the court established its ruling on the grounds of solid evidence.

The court dismissed the appeal.