The documents of the case revealed that the court concluded that the appellant had caused damage to another person in a car accident.

The court said that a criminal ruling was issued against the appellant. The court said that the insurance policy stipulated that the insurance company had the right to claim the value of compensation it paid to the damaged person from the appellant. The court said that the court established its ruling on the grounds of solid evidence and that the appellant's defence was irrelevant in this regard.

The court dismissed the appeal.