Background

A claimant filed a case against the chief of board of directors of a bank and other defendant before the court requesting the dismissal of a preventive detention imposed on her husband's movable property.

The court dismissed the case.

The claimant appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court upheld the appealed ruling.

Decision

The claimant appealed the ruling before the court of cassation and said in her grounds of appeal that the ruling had violated the law.

The court said that this argument was valid because the constitutional court dismissed the legal grounds upon which the preventive detention was imposed on the movables. The court said that the court had violated the law by upholding the appealed ruling.

The court repealed the ruling.