HOL [1964] AC 1129
Rookes v Barnard
Type
Case
Court
UK House of Lords
Jurisdiction
Dubai International Financial Centre
Taxonomy
Breach, Discharge & Rescission of Contract, Damages in Personal Injury, General Tort, Trespass Against the Person, Conspiracy
Decision date
1 Jul 1922
Catchwords
Damages - General Principles - Meaning Of And Distinction Between Terms - Exemplary Damages - Right To Award - Tort - Specific Torts - Trespass And Associated Torts - Unfair Practices - Interference With Contractual Relationships - Intimidation - Threat To Break Contract - Trade, Industry And Industrial Relations - Industrial Action - Trade Dispute Immunity - Immunity From Suit In Tort - Trade Union And Labour Relations Act 1974 S 13(1) - Conspiracy To Injure - As Opposed To Conspiracy To Use Unlawful Means -Which Protected
This case relates to DIFC Case No. 008/2007 and Article 40 of DIFC Law No. 7/2005.
English law recognised the awarding of exemplary damages, that is, damages whose object was to punish or deter and which were distinct from aggravating damages (whereby the motives and conduct of defendant aggravating the injury to plaintiff would be taken into account in assessing compensatory damages); and there were two categories of cases in which an award of exemplary damages could serve a useful purpose, viz, in the case of oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional action by the servants of the government, and in the case where defendant's conduct has been calculated by him to make a profit for himself, which might well exceed the compensation payable to plaintiff.