DIFC 188/2020
Leroy v (1) Loretta (2) Lanen
This case involved a tenancy which had been terminated early as the tenant had not moved into the property. They claimed this was because of defects but in their termination notice had stated it was because of COVID-19. Issues considered included the amount of rent due and the rent of rent cheques. The case also considered whether the tenant who had not moved in was liable for any utility bills and if they should be liable for disputed maintenance issues.
Background
The Claimant Leroy was the tenant of Unit 213 in the DIFC.
The First Defendant was Loretta, a resident of Dubai, UAE, appointed by way of a Power of Attorney to represent the Second Defendant. Any reference to the First Defendant in the Judgment was considered in her capacity as the legal representative of the Second Defendant.
The Second Defendant was Mr Lanen, represented by the First Defendant.