DIFC 014/2010 on 23/03/2015

Taaleem PJSC v National Bonds Corporation PJSC and another-on 23/03/2015

Background facts

The court had delivered a judgment on 19 February 2014, in which it had found that the claimant’s interest in a property (Sky Gardens) had been transferred to the second defendant (Deyaar) and that the claimant’s obligation to repay the first defendant (NBC) the principal money advanced to finance the purchase of that interest, as well as Murabaha profit and late payment charges, had been transferred to Deyaar. The instant proceedings arose due to difficulties in formulating the orders consequent upon that judgment.

Submissions

First, Deyaar submitted that the judgment had not engaged with the question of whether the claimant's obligation to NBC had been novated or assigned to it. Deyaar referred to para 98 of the judgment which stated: ‘In summary therefore the position is, in my judgment, that […] there was a concluded agreement for the transfer of [the claimant's] interest in Sky Gardens to Deyaar …'.