A company filed a case against a defendant before the court. The company requested the court to urgently order the defendant to leave the hotel he had rented. The company said that the defendant had rented the hotel but he had failed to pay the rent for four months. The company said that they had given notice to the defendant but he had failed to vacate the hotel.

The court ruled that the defendant should vacate the hotel.

The defendant appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court upheld the appealed ruling.

The defendant appealed the ruling before the court of cassation. He said in his grounds of appeal that the ruling had insufficient evidence of causation. He said that he had already paid the mentioned rent to the company via cheques. He also said that the contract signed between the two parties did not include an annulling clause.