BCC 930/2019
This case involved the evidence required to prove a defendant had not paid for broadband services they had received. The contract and the bills provided evidence. The contract could not be dismissed or amended without the consent of both parties.
Background
A company filed a case against a defendant before the court. The company requested the court to order the defendant to pay 181 Dinars and interest. The company said that they had provided the defendant with broadband services and that the defendant had failed to pay the remaining bills.
The court dismissed the case.
The company appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court upheld the appealed ruling.
The company appealed the ruling before the court of cassation. The company said in its grounds of appeal that the ruling had insufficient evidence of causation. The company said that the court had established the ruling on the grounds that the company had not provided the court with the required evidence to prove its claims though they had already provided it with the bills.