BCC 437/2006

This case involved a request for a preventative detention on a property and a travel ban after money had been paid for a property sale but the relevant contracts had not been issued. There was no evidence the full property price had been paid so no danger existed that would require a preventative detention or travel ban.

Background

A claimant filed a case against two defendants before the court of urgent affairs requesting the imposition of a preventive detention on a disputed property and a prevention of the defendants from travelling. The claimant said that he had bought the property from the first defendant and paid 50000 Dinars but they failed to release a contract.

The court said that it had no mandate to consider the case.

The claimant appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court upheld the appealed ruling.

Decision