ADCC 1064/2023

The case involved a dispute over the true ownership of a commercial licence registered under another party’s name. The key issue was whether the registration was fictitious or contradicted earlier final judgments confirming contractual ownership.

Background

The First Respondent in Appeal No. 1126/2023 filed Suit No. 457/2023, requesting a ruling to prove the registration of the licence of the centre ... the Third Respondent in the name of the Second Respondent was fictitious, and to prove their ownership of it with all its material and moral components by 100%, and to oblige the Second Respondent to transfer the ownership of the licence of the centre ... the Third Respondent to their name with the competent government agencies.